| 1 |
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On May 5, 2012 3:14 PM, "Markos Chandras" <hwoarang@g.o |
| 4 |
> <mailto:hwoarang@g.o>> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 7 |
>> Hash: SHA512 |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> On 05/05/2012 06:10 PM, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 10 |
>> > On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsov |
| 11 |
>> > <maksbotan@g.o <mailto:maksbotan@g.o>> wrote: |
| 12 |
>> >> Hi, I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected |
| 13 |
>> >> 'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among |
| 14 |
>> >> default USE flags. Why is that needed? I suppose there are more |
| 15 |
>> >> users w/o ldap auth on desktops than with it. So my proposal is |
| 16 |
>> >> to remove it from profiles/targets/desktop/make.defaults. Any |
| 17 |
>> >> objections? |
| 18 |
>> >> |
| 19 |
>> > |
| 20 |
>> > So how are you going to avoid destroying machines that rely on it |
| 21 |
>> > being on by default? |
| 22 |
>> > |
| 23 |
>> > -A |
| 24 |
>> > |
| 25 |
>> Users will note the use flag change when they run "emerge -uDN world" |
| 26 |
>> and they will add it to their make.conf. I am also in favor of |
| 27 |
>> dropping ldap from the desktop profiles. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> I don't like this change much. There are valid use cases for an ldap use |
| 30 |
> flag in the desktop profile that could break easily with this change. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Also, you could make the same case for adding -ldap to your make.conf |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Not to mention, you add the possibility that the user may miss the |
| 36 |
change since they are not expecting it. I would expect it when I was |
| 37 |
changing profiles but not so much just coming out of the blue. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Dale |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
:-) :-) |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
| 46 |
how you interpreted my words! |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
| 49 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
Archives