1 |
On Friday, June 10, 2011 22:36:20 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
> - two has been kicked out for playing along just if they can also make |
3 |
> the rules (as soon as a rule was enacted that they didn't like they |
4 |
> decided to ignore it, even under request to either not do so or be |
5 |
> removed from QA); |
6 |
|
7 |
if i've been ignoring the rules so egregiously that you had to silently remove |
8 |
me from the QA team, then it should be trivial for you to justify your |
9 |
actions. |
10 |
|
11 |
> Finally, I'd like to point out that neither my character nor my actions |
12 |
> have changed the slightest since the mail that Peper quoted — yet I was |
13 |
> elected as team leader; it looks like though people wanted me to scream |
14 |
> at anyone else beside them — too easy that way. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> And the only two people in the team who bothered to cast a vote (Luca |
17 |
> and Christian), seems not to have an issue with me keeping this way. |
18 |
|
19 |
yes, lack of choice and actual votes makes you the default winner, but you |
20 |
really shouldnt play it up like everyone thinks you should be in the role. |
21 |
ive stated many times that your approach is not how a leader should behave, |
22 |
but you usually counter it with more of the same. |
23 |
-mike |