Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>
Subject: Re: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for February
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:34:37 -0500
"Wulf C. Krueger" <philantrop@g.o> said:
> "EAPI=1 approved for use in the main tree
> ----------------------------------------
> 
> Stable portage version 2.1.3.12 supports EAPI=1. It's now officially OK 
> to start using it in the main tree. From the ebuild ChangeLog for 
> portage:
> 
>   This release is the first to have support for EAPI-1 (#194876), which 
>   includes SLOT dependencies (#174405), IUSE defaults (#174410), and 
>   ECONF_SOURCE support for the default src_compile function (#179380). 
>   Package maintainers should carefully consider the backward compatibility 
>   consequences before defining EAPI="1" in any ebuilds, especially if
>   other packages depend on those ebuilds. See the ebuild(5) and emerge(1) 
>   manual pages for EAPI related documentation.
> 
> EAPI=1 features are documented in PMS as well as the man pages, but they 
> are not yet documented in the devmanual or the dev handbook."

Okay, so I stand corrected about them approving it.  Where is the
approved specification though?  PMS is still a draft the last time I
heard, and if it isn't, we should have a non-moving version that is
authoritive about EAPI=1.  (And no, the man pages are not a
specification, nor is a list of bugs...give us one document that we can
point to)

I can get it put into devmanual as soon as I can find the approved
authoritative source to base information off of.

-- 
Mark Loeser
email         -   halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
email         -   mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web           -   http://www.halcy0n.com
Attachment:
pgpb5q2cY8oL8.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for February
-- Wulf C. Krueger
References:
One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for February
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for February
-- Mark Loeser
Re: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for February
-- Wulf C. Krueger
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for February
Next by thread:
Re: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for February
Previous by date:
Re: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for February
Next by date:
Re: Kerberos Maintainence


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.