Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual/pkgconfig to support lighter alternatives
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 19:34:20
Message-Id: 201205041534.30034.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual/pkgconfig to support lighter alternatives by Samuli Suominen
1 On Friday 04 May 2012 05:43:55 Samuli Suominen wrote:
2 > =dev-util/pkgconfig-9999 with USE="internal-glib" in Portage. I'm
3 > hoping this will render the pkg-config-lite useless so we can drop it.
4 >
5 > I'm very much intrested in knowing if this matches the requirements for
6 > doing so, so I can decide whether I should be rolling also a snapshot
7 > ebuild for ~arch or not.
8
9 i followed up in the bug
10
11 > And I'll look into making pkgconfig-openbsd suitable for the virtual
12 > today too, but I'm not expecting to KEYWORD it ever since even the
13 > OpenBSD guys declare it only partly compatible in their docs/code.
14
15 perl is for masochists ;)
16 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies