List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On 24 June 2012 06:50, Gilles Dartiguelongue <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Le samedi 23 juin 2012 à 18:30 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
>> It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat "the gtk3
>> version" or "the jruby version" as being newer versions of "the gtk2
>> version" or "the ruby 1.8 version", just as it tries to bring in a
>> newer GCC and so on.
> I'm stopping my reading of this thread a minute to answer here.
> This is actually true when you think of it, gtk3 bindings are newer than
Now you're playing with semantics. In the case of -r200/-r300 we
are talking about the *exact same* $PV, but for some reason
the revision numbers are confusingly abused for something
that we normally use useflags for (toggling support for specific
toolkits for example).
Please stop abusing revision numbers for something they are
not meant to convey. And please stop pushing developers to
drop perfectly legal usage of the gtk3 useflag.
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo Qt project lead