Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Paweł Hajdan
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting)
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:09:46
Message-Id: 4D45A909.5090407@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting) by "Tomáš Chvátal"
1 On 1/28/11 10:11 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
2 > So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
3 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
4
5 I'd suggest to split the diff, discussion and voting to make it more
6 focused:
7
8 1) QA team lead, deputy, and accepting new members of the QA team
9 2) Revoking/reevaluating commit rights
10
11 While I mostly agree with both suggested updates, 2) is obviously very
12 controversial. It would be great to hear what QA team thinks about it,
13 especially some rationale about the changes.
14
15 Also, I think we don't have a "too much QA" problem in Gentoo. The
16 opposite may be true (i.e. "not enough QA").
17
18 Paweł

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature