Archives
Archives
| From: | Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] | ||
| Date: | Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:46:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4AAD4BF7.8000806@hartwork.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] by "Alexander Færøy" |
||
| 1 | Alexander Færøy wrote: |
| 2 | >> Second issue: "I want foopackage and barpackage, but not your hacked gcc" |
| 3 | >> Overlays can overshadow tree packages, which can have undesired effects. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Support for overlay information in package.mask? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Once we have repository-specific atoms we get that for free. |
| 8 | Maybe we can not make it take ages somehow. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Sebastian |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] | "Alexander Færøy" <ahf@××××.dk> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay usage and maintainence [was: DistroWatch and Gentoo packages: status quo and future] | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |