| 1 |
On Thursday 03 May 2012 20:49:25 Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 03/05/12 16:18, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thursday 03 May 2012 17:39:30 Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> I fail to understand why a *WEB BROWSER* needs elfutils and dbus and |
| 5 |
> >> udev as hard-coded dependancies. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > you need to think bigger. Chromium supports joystick inputs (which come |
| 8 |
> > and go) for playing games in the browser, so udev makes sense. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> So is it using libudev to get that information? I guess would be |
| 11 |
> possible to patch it out, probably dbus would cover that base as well. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
i'm not sure that info is broadcasted over dbus. at any rate, if it is, i'm |
| 14 |
not sure that would gain traction upstream unless it was an improvement. and |
| 15 |
if it's not going upstream, i don't Paweł is keen on maintaining it locally. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> (As soon I have some time I might dabble with a dbus integration for mdev) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
we would have to make mdev available as a sep package then ... don't want |
| 20 |
busybox itself linking against anything beyond the C library. |
| 21 |
-mike |
Archives