Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:51:50
Message-Id: b41005391003270951g2f7354f4u2ccd3118bd2e497b@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch by Torsten Veller
1 On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Torsten Veller <ml-en@××××××.net> wrote:
2 > * Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>:
3 >> So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch:
4 >
5 >> In support (and my comments in support):
6 >>  - Can be used as a gentle reminder for slacker arches
7 >
8 > And if not "only one arch" or "single arch" is slacking?
9 > I guess you would find another gentle way to remind them.
10 >
11 >
12 > How about a tool generating mails to arch teams, which lists all
13 > STABLEREQ, KEQWORDREQ bugs to which the arch team is CC'ed for a month?
14 > (Or probably easier or possible at all: which weren't changed for 30 days.)
15
16 I'd opt for a webpage personally. I have found that push-nag systems
17 work well at first until the nagging increases to a level where the
18 nag-ee just filters the mail away. This happens often at work. For
19 example I get emails telling me to delete unused perforce clients; but
20 those mails just get marked as read by a filter and archived.
21
22 Could we generate a bugzilla search for arch teams? Do arch teams
23 already use existing bugzilla functionality?
24
25 -A
26
27 >
28 >

Replies