Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stefan Behte <craig@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Thoughts about broken package handling
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:50:06
Message-Id: 4E07C579.7040608@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Thoughts about broken package handling by Stuart Longland
1 Hi,
2
3 yes, it's no fun to update oldish gentoo Systems - especially ones that
4 should only receive security updates.
5
6 > My bugbear at the moment, is often a package is broken for more than one
7 > reason in my situation, and I find myself having to manhandle the
8 > package lists generated by the above three, building each package
9 > one-by-one, until I manage to rebuild them all.
10
11 Been there, done that... :/
12
13 > Concept:
14 >
15 > Tool will be written in separate modules to handle:
16 > - ELF soname change breakage
17 > - Python module updates
18 > - Perl module updates
19 > - other checks that can cause broken packages...
20 >
21 > Each check is run in order, generating a list of packages that should be
22 > rebuilt.
23
24
25 If you do a complete update, you will probably update the kernel (maybe
26 only for security reasons), too. In that case,
27 sys-kernel/module-rebuild, might be of interest here, too. It stores a
28 list of packages that compile kernel modules, and those will need
29 recompilation after a kernel update.
30
31 Best regards,
32
33 Craig