| 1 |
On Friday 12 of March 2010 17:17:01 Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12-03-2010 08:46:34 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
| 3 |
> > That said they were perfectly entitled to make the decision of not |
| 4 |
> > wanting to maintain qt3 any longer. The only advice I can give is that |
| 5 |
> > all disgruntled users and developers create a qt3 project and |
| 6 |
> > adopt/unmask/re-commit the qt3 libraries for maintainers of packages |
| 7 |
> > who need it. I doubt this will happen as this could have been done a |
| 8 |
> > long time ago, but it's never too late. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Didn't we have a graveyard thing/overlay somewhere some day? Some users |
| 11 |
> might happily prefer to use stuff that's treecleaned, or removed due |
| 12 |
> security issues. If removal of stuff would mean it's dumped in there it |
| 13 |
> can be easily used by users and more easily readded later afterwards, if |
| 14 |
> need arises. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Yes, it's called kde-sunset and it contains KDE3 and should contain Qt3 |
| 17 |
applications (maybe it does, may not all of them though) removed from tree |
| 18 |
recently. It's not graveyard really as some users actively maintain this |
| 19 |
overlay. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde-sunset.git |
| 22 |
(layman -a kde-sunset) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
regards |
| 26 |
MM |
Archives