Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: "gentoo-dev@g.o" <gentoo-dev@g.o>
From: Richard Yao <ryao@g.o>
Subject: My wishlist for EAPI 5
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:25:30 -0400
Here is my wishlist for EAPI 5:

Multilib (and/or multiarch) support
Automated epatch_user support
Parallel make checks
POSIX Shell compliance

Here are some explanations:

Multilib (and/or multiarch) support
	The current binaries cause a great deal of pain, particularly when a
user does not want to upgrade something. I had this problem with WINE
and glibc because I wanted to avoid the reverse memcpy() fiasco on my
systems. This situation would have been avoided entirely if the package
manager supported multilib.

Automated epatch_user support
	Users should be able to test patches without modifying their ebuilds.
This also saves developer time because we don't need to navigate the
portage tree (or an overlay), make a change and test it. We could just
dump the patch in the appropriate directory and build.

Parallel make checks
	As it stands, `make check` is so slow that few people actually run it
and QA suffers as a result. We have the ability to do parallel checks,
but we need to explicitly put `emake check` into the ebuild and use
autoconf 1.12 to get that. It would be best if this behavior were the
default, not the exception.

POSIX Shell compliance
	There has been a great deal of work done to give the user full control
of what is on his system and there is more that we can do there. In
particular, I think a lean Gentoo Linux system should be able to use
busybox sh and nothing else. That requires POSIX shell compliance.
OpenRC init scripts support this and the configure scripts support this.
The few exceptions are bugs that are addressed by the Gentoo BSD developers.
	As such, I think we should make EAPI=5 use POSIX shell by default. If
an ebuild requires bash, we can allow the ebuild to declare that (e.g.
WANT_SH=bash), but that should be the exception and not the rule.


Replies:
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
-- Mike Frysinger
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
-- Alec Warner
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
-- Luca Barbato
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
-- Maxim Kammerer
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot
Next by thread:
Re: My wishlist for EAPI 5
Previous by date:
Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot
Next by date:
Re: Killing UEFI Secure Boot


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.