| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tuesday 22 April 2003 07:41 pm, Cedric Veilleux wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I think it is the easiest and best solution.. what the heck is going on |
| 7 |
> in this darn -core list that must be kept secret? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I do understand the imPortance of allowing only developers post to it, |
| 10 |
> but really, I don't see what's the point of keeping it secret. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Every OS development staff has private lists; Gentoo is no exception. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
There are many cases in which something needs to be brought to the |
| 16 |
attention of the developers but is not for public consumption. For |
| 17 |
example: a security vulnerability. We need an appropriate forum to |
| 18 |
handle these kinds of issues, besides general dev team personnel/political |
| 19 |
ones. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
There is some merit in saying that some topics discussed in -core should be |
| 22 |
moved to -dev. I believe everyone will see that happen. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Cheers, |
| 25 |
Dylan Carlson |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
| 28 |
Key fingerprint = 3AEA DE38 FE42 15A6 C0E2 730E 3D04 BCC1 708E 165F |
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iD8DBQE+pnnuPQS8wXCOFl8RAjmFAJ9FKnyMDQnP2eyzwkZ6E+NMyLOo0wCfbPgV |
| 33 |
b9JrMOfO9x6uCxrPk+YUCTU= |
| 34 |
=HtSC |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives