Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Subject: Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:25:59 +0200
>>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote:

> Thanks for the reminder; I looked, and it turns out that we now have
> a great precedent.

> Quoting PMS:

> "The required bash version was retroactively updated from 3.0 to 3.2
> in November 2009 (see http://www.gentoo.
> org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091109.txt)."

> So we could just retroactively update it again and let people scream
> if they're actually affected by this.

If you read the quoted council log, you'll find that the retroactive
change was done because usage of bash 3.2 features in the tree was
already widespread at that time. This is very different from the
current situation, therefore it is not at all a precedent.

Ulrich


Replies:
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Michał Górny
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Tomáš Chvátal
References:
[RFC] obs eclasses
-- Michal Hrusecky
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Joshua Kinard
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Donnie Berkholz
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Patrick Lauer
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
-- Donnie Berkholz
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
Next by thread:
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
Previous by date:
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses
Next by date:
Re: [RFC] obs eclasses


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.