Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:48:19
Message-Id: 4E42EE56.6040208@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2 > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:49:38AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
3 >
4 >
5 >> I am concerned about /var being included in this because of the
6 >> potential of filling up the root partition.
7 >>
8 > Err, I don't follow. How does mounting /var fill up the root partition?
9 >
10 >
11
12 If you take /var off its own partition and put it on /, then it will
13 fill up / instead of /var. Filling up /var, not the end of the world.
14 Filling up / is a bad thing.
15
16 BTW, I have /var on its own partition. This moving things to / and not
17 being able to have /usr, /var and such makes me really nervous. I have
18 about double the needed space on /var and I still have had it fill up
19 not once but several times. Think OOo build here. If /var didn't have
20 its own partition, I would have had a crashed system and would have had
21 to use a another bootable medium to clean out some stuff so it would
22 boot again. I'm just glad I am setting at my system. If it was remote,
23 I would be VERY pissed at whoever started this / only stuff.
24
25 I guess next /home will have to be on / too. Since everything else is
26 moving that way, why not. May as well lose everything and be done with
27 it. Right?
28
29 Just a users point of view. A long time Gentoo user I might add. I
30 still have my 1.4 CD.
31
32 Dale
33
34 :-) :-)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr vs. initramfs redux "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>