Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:17:30
Message-Id: 200609210024.42739.kugelfang@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds by Chris White
1 Am Mittwoch, 20. September 2006 23:33 schrieb Chris White:
2 > On Wednesday 20 September 2006 13:27, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 > > I was under the impression that you were supposed to GLEP anything
4 > > of this scope and get council approval... The "anyone can make a
5 > > project" rule doesn't replace the requirement to GLEP large
6 > > changes.
7 >
8 > Why? It's in an overlay so it's not actually part of the Gentoo
9 > project,
10 Wrong. It is a new (top-level) project.
11 > it's using existing methods with a difference in
12 > distribution formats
13 Partly wrong. Gentoo/Seeds wants to use stage4 tarballs, among other
14 things.
15 > to provide something that will be hopefully
16 > usefull to the community. I'm also sorry that you think my flame
17 > guide is a ... um.. GLEP(?). I guess I'm enhancing Gentoo by
18 > requesting that more llama action be put in GLEPS (rar?).
19 Senseless.
20
21 What did you want to contribute to the discussion?
22
23 Danny
24 --
25 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
26 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>