On 08:56 Tue 23 Sep     , Zac Medico wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote 
> > on, let us know!  Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev 
> > list to see.
> 
> Please vote on deploying the PROPERTIES variable to the cache [1].
> Also, please vote on deploying PROPERTIES=interactive in ebuilds [2].
> 
> [1]
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_4f3815d44c50f988c8072eccb504c803.xml
> [2]
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_1266d26d46320ed4d373a8d540577cad.xml

I might not send an agenda out because this thread was so short and 
sweet, and I'm fairly busy.

The additional item I'd like to add before PROPERTIES is whether there's 
any need for the council to approve either of these. I don't recall us 
approving cache changes in the past -- I think that's been done by the 
portage team.

I tend to say we don't need to vote on PROPERTIES in cache, but perhaps 
we should on 'interactive' so that global ebuild variables, even without 
EAPI changes, are approved by the council.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com