| 1 |
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:45 +0100, "Pawe³ Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2/27/12 10:37 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 3 |
> >> I think somebody pointed some "revdep-rebuild" versions where exiting |
| 4 |
> >> with successful code even when failed, was fixed version stabilized? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > No, it is only in -9999 so far. It has not been released in a -0.3* |
| 7 |
> > ebuild yet. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > The last patch to revdep-rebuild fixing return codes is: |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gentoolkit.git;a=commit;h=3e51df74595c535656ef9f38bf7a577a4f64d0f5 |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > from 11 days ago. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> If the maintainers of the package in question do not consider it |
| 16 |
> important enough to do a release (not even mentioning stabilization), I |
| 17 |
> don't think this is blocking. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Any further objections? (I'm going to listen) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Yes, you are going to break systems if you do this change. If you |
| 23 |
really want to do this before we have a fixed gentoolkit to support it, |
| 24 |
then put yourself in the tools-portage herd and handle all of the bugs |
| 25 |
that arise out of the change. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I just did a new release of gentoolkit-0.3.0.5 with the fixes in them so |
| 28 |
that you could do this change once it gets stable. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Regards, |
| 31 |
Paul |
Archives