1 |
On 09/11/2010 10:31 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 11-09-2010 21:29:22 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
3 |
>>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Petteri Räty wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>>> Update EAPI. Fix dependencies. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>> This message does not tell why the EPREFIX stuff was removed. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Come on. EAPI was updated to 3, and removal of the EPREFIX assignments |
10 |
>> are part of that. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I thought the same initially, then I realised that Petteri probably |
13 |
> meant that "Update EAPI" doesn't really say anything. Mention EAPI=3 |
14 |
> in the commit message and it is all clear. (From the ChangeLog |
15 |
> perspective an EAPI bump/update shouldn't really matter much as it |
16 |
> shouldn't change anything for the user.) |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
I was thinking it could have been something along the lines of "Fix |
20 |
dependencies and cleanup the ebuild by making use of EAPI 3." For me the |
21 |
connection between EAPI 3 and the prefix was not obvious so probably not |
22 |
for everyone else either. I agree with Fabian that ChangeLog should not |
23 |
be verbose about things that don't affect users in any way. For that |
24 |
kind of stuff you can be verbose in the CVS commit message. |
25 |
|
26 |
Regards, |
27 |
Petteri |
28 |
|
29 |
Petteri |