Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Jackson <brian@××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] missing man pages (Was: [gentoo-user] Re: en_US.UTF-8 unknown?)
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 15:26:27
Message-Id: 200303070925.05956.brian@mdrx.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] missing man pages (Was: [gentoo-user] Re: en_US.UTF-8 unknown?) by "James H. Cloos Jr."
1 On Friday 07 March 2003 01:56 am, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:
2 > >>>>> "gabor" == gabor <gabor@××××.net> writes:
3 >
4 > gabor> long answer:
5 > gabor>
6 > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=34923&highlight=%2Autf%2A+%2Aglibc
7 >%2A
8 >
9 > gabor> short answer: do this as root: "localedef -f UTF-8 -i en_US
10 > en_US.UTF-8"
11 >
12 > That link mentions that gentoo lacks a man page for localdef(1), not
13 > to mention one for locale(7).
14 >
15 > Other dists have these man pages. Debian in general requires a man
16 > page for every command, et al.
17 >
18 > Gentoo should start a policy to also require man pages. Most of the
19 > work is already done: grab the pages from the debs and/or rpms.
20 > (More precisely from the sources for the debs and rpms.)
21 >
22 > Clearly the licensing permits such cross-pollination. Take advantage
23 > of it.
24 >
25 > -JimC
26 >
27 > P.S. Wierd! ispell -- even though as installed here is older than
28 > gentoo -- recognized gentoo as spelled correctly, but did not
29 > recognize debian.... Nor does it recognize redhat or suse. :-)
30
31 If you read about where the gentoo name came from it is an actual word. It's
32 some small fast penguin from some islands. Look around on the gentoo website
33 if you are that interested.
34
35 >
36 >
37 > --
38 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
39
40
41 --
42 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list