| 1 |
On Wednesday 14 October 2009 02:41:51 Branko Badrljica wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > i really dont buy this argument, but ignoring that, poor admin policy is |
| 4 |
> > no excuse. blindly accepting all unstable versions of a package instead |
| 5 |
> > of pinning a specific version and then expecting a stable system isnt |
| 6 |
> > going to happen. Thomas is absolutely right here. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Well, if eh is absolutely right, then I won't argue anymore. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> But just as an notice, I didn't expect STABLE but at least DOCUMENTED |
| 11 |
> system ? |
| 12 |
> Is that too much to ask ? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
sapphire ~ # qlist openrc | grep doc |
| 15 |
/usr/share/doc/openrc/net.example |
| 16 |
/usr/share/doc/openrc/net.default |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> And even if I did a mistake of keywording openrc-0* instead of |
| 20 |
> openrc-0.4-r3, do I really deserve such knife in the back ? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Knife, eh? The worst thing could happen to you i lack of net connection. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> And who should write documentation for new code ? Unreasonable users |
| 26 |
> that find it not working or perhaps authors ? |
| 27 |
> While I recognise the fact that Gentoo is not commercial distro, I want |
| 28 |
> also some recognition for value of my time as a passive tester. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Upstream already provides such a documentation as you can see above. Gentoo |
| 32 |
provides migration guide. I believe doc team will update use flag description |
| 33 |
as soon as it's possible. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
But that's all has been already said. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Cheers |
| 39 |
Dawid Węgliński |
Archives