Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: New global USE flag called "ios", not same as "ipod" ?
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:25:20
Message-Id: 4D91C191.3060302@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: New global USE flag called "ios", not same as "ipod" ? by Angelo Arrifano
1 On 03/29/2011 02:21 PM, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
2 > On Ter, 2011-03-29 at 14:16 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
3 >> On 03/29/2011 02:07 PM, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
4 >>> On Ter, 2011-03-29 at 06:23 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
5 >>>> The magic number is often 5, this is 4 but it's only magic!
6 >>>>
7 >>>> ios (gnome-base/gvfs):
8 >>>> ios (media-libs/libgpod):
9 >>>> ios (media-sound/clementine):
10 >>>> ios (sys-power/upower):
11 >>>>
12 >>>>
13 >>>> Does this look proper?
14 >>>>
15 >>>> "Enable imobiledevice support for Apple's iPhone, iPod, and iPad with
16 >>>> iOS operating system."
17 >>>>
18 >>>> Hints from here:
19 >>>>
20 >>>> http://www.libimobiledevice.org/
21 >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS_(Apple)
22 >>>>
23 >>>
24 >>> Not quite. ipod flag usually covers the old iPod versions without iOS.
25 >>> The iphone use flag covers some features present on the iPhone and not
26 >>> necessarily present on all iPods (with iOS). So yeah, the ios use flag
27 >>> makes sense to cover all devices with iOS ipod or iphone.
28 >>>
29 >>> Regards,
30 >>
31 >> What do you mean by "Not quite." when you basically confirmed everything
32 >> I've said?
33 >
34 > Sorry, I was answering the question in the email's subject... I also
35 > apologize for the double reply, but that is evolution's fault.
36 >
37 > So yeah, thumbs up for new "ios" use flag.
38 >
39 >
40
41 Oooook, thought so ;-)
42
43 - Samuli