Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.31 stable plans
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:04:30
Message-Id: 87iqdpmjfp.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.31 stable plans by "Rémi Cardona"
1 Rémi Cardona <remi@g.o> writes:
2
3 > Ditto, 2.6.32 will have new features for X users and I'd like to have
4 > it keyworded and stabilized at the same time as gentoo-sources.
5 >
6 > Is that doable? Are there any specific reasons why both aren't bumped
7 > at the same time? Man power issues? Lack of cookies/beer/ponies?
8
9 Not just stabilising at the same time, it would also be nice if
10 linux-headers was put into ~arch at the same time as the corresponding
11 gentoo-sources. Even though the of stabilising 2.6.31 has been proposed,
12 linux-headers-2.6.31 is still not in the tree. Ideally, I think it would
13 be nice if the corresponding linux-headers were put into tree, but
14 packaged masked, when the -rc vanilla-sources are put into ~arch, but
15 that is probably asking too much.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.31 stable plans Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>