1.1

On Wednesday 23 April 2008 23:01:38 Graham Murray wrote:
> Roy Marples <roy@...> writes:
> > On Wednesday 23 April 2008 21:46:18 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >> See my attached example from work, we use a lot of the various options
> >> on stuff.
> >
> > No, we won't support that. However, we will bring back ip ranges for the
> > last ocet like so
> > 1.2.3.4-10/24
>
> It looks to me as though you are intending to remove the capability to
> set up complex network environments.

No I'm not.
I'm making it easy for simple configs AND complex ones. Just not through the 
same variable.

> [1] But in my opinion, the baselayout-1 /etc/net.conf syntax is better than
> that in baselayout-2. Though I have not yet migrated any of the systems
> with complex networking to baselayout-2.

Sadly, default scripts we ship have to work with shells other than bash.
Of course, you're still welcome to use config_eth0 as a bash array as that 
still works and will for the foreseeable future.

Thanks

Roy
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list