| 1 |
Hi all, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:34:08PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 4 |
> On 02/08/2010 02:11 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hi, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.de>: |
| 8 |
> >> A Gnome user probably has "X gtk -qt" in make.conf, while a KDE user |
| 9 |
> >> has "X qt -gtk" in hope to have programs that support both Gtk and Qt |
| 10 |
> >> being built with the toolkit that is more native to his DE. When a |
| 11 |
> >> package has a GUI tool that is able to only use one of those |
| 12 |
> >> toolkits, people who have it disabled in make.conf will get no GUI |
| 13 |
> >> tool at all even though they have "X" in their USE flags. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Your proposal does not look to appealing to me. What about people |
| 16 |
> > trying to keep "pollution" down and avoid one or the other toolkit? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> This would mean that we favor one group of people over another :P |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
If a package can run in some form without a certain toolkit, why should |
| 21 |
we force people to install that toolkit with the package? Imho that is |
| 22 |
bloating their systems unnecessarily. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
William |
Archives