Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgios Kylafas <gkyla@×××××××××.gr>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:29:49
Message-Id: 200212171630.59135.gkyla@mail.ntua.gr
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? by "Aurélien Gouny"
1 On Tuesday 17 December 2002 15:53, Aurélien Gouny wrote:
2 > Thomas T. Veldhouse said:
3 > > Rodney,
4 > >
5 > > Please remask this (portage-2.0.45-r6) ASAP.
6 > >
7 > > Tom Veldhouse
8 >
9 > I'm not Rodney but I've made a 'emerge rsync' and there is no portage to
10 > be updated, it seems to have been masked.
11
12 I checked /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask after a new "emerge sync" and
13 the relevant line says:
14
15 # <carpaski@g.o> (15 Dec 2002)
16 # Masking for prelink testing.
17 >sys-apps/portage-2.0.45-r6
18
19 I would expect it to be ">=sys-apps/portage-2.0.45-r6" (note the equal
20 sign), if it was masked indeed.
21
22 I also did:
23
24 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -up world
25
26 and it did not turn up portage-2.0.45-r6 either. Any clues how it
27 disappeared?
28
29 Furthermore, does anyone have any suggestions on how to recover from a
30 merging of that offensive portage-2.0.45-r6? My approach is to compile (on
31 another machine) glibc and gcc (with ebuild xxx.ebuild package) and move it
32 over to the broken machine.
33
34 Giorgos
35
36 --
37 Georgios E. Kylafas
38 gkyla@×××××××××.gr
39
40 --
41 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY messed up ? Pat Double <double@×××××××××.com>