Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:36:27
Message-Id: 1297679742.7123.9.camel@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item by Ciaran McCreesh
1 El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 20:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
2 > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:00:31 +0100
3 > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
4 > > If rest of gnome team agrees, I think we could go with, but I still
5 > > fail to see what is the "technical" problem on allowing CAMERAS="*"
6 > > to be used :-|
7 >
8 > 'cameras_*' isn't a valid use flag name, so the package mangler can't
9 > just pass the * through to the ebuild, which means it has to expand the
10 > value itself. But there's no complete list of every CAMERA value
11 > anywhere, so it can't.
12 >
13 > There were plans to fix this in EAPI 4 by requiring that IUSE be
14 > accurate. That would have allowed the package mangler to use IUSE to
15 > get a complete list of known CAMERAS and be able to expand * that way.
16 > Unfortunately, that feature got dropped, and so in EAPI 4 you're still
17 > allowed to make use of USE_EXPAND variables without making sure IUSE is
18 > complete.
19 >
20
21 Do you know if there are any plans on implementing it on a future EAPI?
22 I think being able to simply enable all of them with "*" would be
23 interesting (at least in the future)
24
25 Thanks for the information

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] libgphoto2-2.4.10 news item Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>