Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@g.o>
Subject: Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:58:46 +0200
Am Samstag, den 03.04.2010, 12:50 +0300 schrieb Petteri Räty:
> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just
> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
> disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this:
Yes, please remove it. Keep it simple and stupid. LATER means it's not
resolved and is as such not a valid resolution.

-- 
Tiziano Müller
Gentoo Linux Developer
Areas of responsibility:
  Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor
E-Mail   : dev-zero@g.o
GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5  4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30
Attachment:
smime.p7s (S/MIME cryptographic signature)
References:
Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
-- Petteri Räty
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Next by thread:
Re: Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
Previous by date:
Re: [RFC] More reliable hiding preserved libraries
Next by date:
Re: [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.