| 1 |
El mié, 04-11-2009 a las 15:48 -0600, Dale escribió: |
| 2 |
> Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 3 |
> > 2009/11/4 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >> Is it possible to just mask and maybe keyword KDE 3? |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > This has already been decided. We are moving it to an overlay. |
| 9 |
> > I can't think of a valid reason why you would not use that overlay. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Because I don't want one more thing to have to deal with. Gentoo is |
| 13 |
> enough fun already. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
But, why do you think having kde3 stuff hardmasked in main tree in |
| 16 |
unmaintained state will be better than having it on a external |
| 17 |
overlay? :-/ |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Also, think about gnome users (like me) that will not need to download |
| 20 |
all kde3 ebuilds on every sync :-) Yes, maybe they aren't so much but I |
| 21 |
still fail to see why do you think that preserving kde3 hardmasked is |
| 22 |
better than using an overlay |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Regards |
Archives