| 1 |
On 20-12-2009 22:16:30 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> gmane is f-ed up already irregardless of what we do. it eats cross-posted e- |
| 3 |
> mails for breakfast and doesnt tell anyone. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> as for archives.g.o, file a bug if it isnt handling threading within a list |
| 6 |
> properly. i dont really see how your proposal here would break archives.g.o |
| 7 |
> anyways. someone sends an e-mail to both dev and dev-announce, it has the |
| 8 |
> same id. people respond and they all go to dev. either way, archives.g.o |
| 9 |
> should be seeing a sane thread on dev. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
New devs are not announced to -dev, the mail is only sent to |
| 12 |
-dev-announce. The "January 2010 meeting date" mail was only sent to |
| 13 |
-dev-announce (and -council), not to -dev, hence replies (that have to |
| 14 |
go to -dev) are replies with the original mail missing. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If all mail that would go to -dev-announce would guaranteed be sent to |
| 17 |
-dev as well, I didn't have to check -dev-announce, and archives.g.o |
| 18 |
would also have the original "January 2010 meeting date" mail in the |
| 19 |
thread on -dev. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 24 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives