Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Toby Dickenson <tdickenson@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage.
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:00:25
Message-Id: 200403251000.22454.tdickenson@devmail.geminidataloggers.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. by Paul de Vrieze
1 On Thursday 25 March 2004 09:39, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
2
3 > Especially as we don't
4 > want to limit who may commit where.
5
6 Short term, of course thats true. Long term, surely this is a critical part of
7 managing an increasingly large number of developers by controlling the scope
8 of damage that can be caused by compromise of *one* key / or one rogue
9 developer.
10
11 > In some cases it is actually
12 > essential that certain parties (managers) perform fast commits on a
13 > package they are not normally involved with.
14
15 certain parties, sure. do all developers need this?
16
17 --
18 Toby Dickenson
19
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>