Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds?
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:58:52
Message-Id: 489502DC.6010805@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds? by Thomas de Grenier de Latour
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
5 > On 2008/08/01, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
6 >
7 >> It might good to add support for a new RESTRICT=live value in
8 >> ebuilds.
9 >
10 > Since some people have a problem with this flag being put there, what
11 > about IUSE=live-rebuild as an alternative? It's "use.desc" would be
12 > something like "add this package to the @live-rebuild set (only for
13 > Portage 2.2_rc6 and above)". And the set implementation would be
14 > modified to only include packages for which this flag is enabled.
15 >
16
17 That's an interesting idea, however I think RESTRICT is a better fit
18 for the attribute that we're trying to model. USE flags are
19 something that can be enable or disabled but the user but the
20 behavior of the src_unpack() method downloading live sources is not
21 something that's generally controlled by a USE flag afaik. Are there
22 any existing ebuilds that allow src_unpack to be toggled in this way
23 via a USE flag? Is this something that would be desireable?
24
25 Zac
26 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
27 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
28
29 iEYEARECAAYFAkiVAtsACgkQ/ejvha5XGaNWLwCgvOkEutL+2IYGF5Nz0ncH1GL/
30 k/8An3lwrLOUKKFaTNMVaYBLd0OryI67
31 =6uSV
32 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New RESTRICT=live value for identification of live ebuilds? Thomas de Grenier de Latour <tom.gl@××××.fr>