Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Thursday 08 February 2007, Ned Ludd wrote:
> Please read over what's been talked about elsewhere in this thread. He
> is not trying to break existing functionality at all. Only extend it to
> be posix aware (additionally)
erm, no ... our code is a superset of POSIX, so technically yes he is breaking
existing functionality and doing the quite opposite of extending
-mike
|
|
