Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Justin <jlec@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:12:38 +0200
On 30.05.2012 18:58, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 12:53 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>> Hi!
> 
>> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test
>>>> the conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though.
>>>
>>> A mock conversion would probably help with creating 
>>> procedures/docs/etc as well.  It is nice to say that we're "just
>>> going to use git" but I think everybody has a slightly different
>>> picture of how that is going to work.
> 
>> I recommend having a smallish set of willing alpha/beta testers
>> for this. This usually helps with some of the near-edge cases.
>> You'll still find a thousand other bugs once things go live for 
>> everybody. Still, it turns a million into a thousand. It also gives
>> you slightly more realistic load test. .... Regards, Tobias
> 
> 
> As one that's relatively new to Git, I'm a perfect candidate for
> testing. If we go this way, I volunteer.
> 
> - Aaron
> 

As I am a hater of CVS and my current checkout is repeatability spiting
weird errors, I would join as a tester here.

justin

Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Alexey Shvetsov
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Tobias Klausmann
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Aaron W. Swenson
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Lastrites: sys-cluster/lam-mpi
Previous by date:
Re: Should packages auto-eselect alternative implementation on removal?
Next by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.