1 |
Pieter, |
2 |
|
3 |
Thanks!!! The -r6 is the only one that matters right now. While |
4 |
doing the initial test emerge of r6 yesterday, I saw the same problems I |
5 |
am having with the ebuild of 8 that I'm working on. I think 8 is going |
6 |
to need a rewrite from scratch instead of just an adaption of the |
7 |
pervios perl install. And thanks for catching my foobar with the -r in |
8 |
the header :) |
9 |
|
10 |
Mike |
11 |
|
12 |
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 06:25:30AM -0500, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> > perl-5.6.1-r6: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> emerge was successfull on ppc |
17 |
> added ppc keyword |
18 |
> did not unmask it, but added a small comment to packages.mask |
19 |
> |
20 |
> > perl-5.8.0: |
21 |
> |
22 |
> emerge failed on ppc, compilation succeeded but make test failed: This |
23 |
> problem seems to be similar to the ghostscript problem I had earlier. One |
24 |
> of the perl tests tries to perform some tests on the cache, and my machine |
25 |
> seems to loop forever performing this test. (Could this be kernel related? |
26 |
> can anyone with a Titanium 2 machine (550) test this?) |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I also corrected the headers of some of the files (5.6.1-r6 had a 5.6.1-r3 |
29 |
> header... I noticed that lintool *.ebuild did not complain about this |
30 |
> but lintool <individual ebuild> did.) |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Best regards, |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Pieter |
35 |
> |
36 |
> > On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Michael Cummings wrote: |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > > > From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> |
39 |
> > > > Date: Mon Aug 05, 2002 03:59:31 Europe/Brussels |
40 |
> > > > To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
41 |
> > > > Cc: gentoo-core@g.o |
42 |
> > > > Subject: [gentoo-dev] perl-5.6.1-r6 masked, needs testing on non i686's |
43 |
> > > > |
44 |
> > > > Hey all, |
45 |
> > > > |
46 |
> > > > While working on the ebuild for 5.8.0, I noticed a few hardcoded |
47 |
> > > > references to the i686 architecture. Further looking found it in all of |
48 |
> > > > the 5.6.1 releases as well. I have commited (MASKED) perl-5.6.1-r6 and |
49 |
> > > > would appreciate anyone willing to test. I changed the lines that |
50 |
> > > > referred specifically to the i686 dir structure to instead use the |
51 |
> > > > variable $PARCH, which should contain your platform specific arch name. |
52 |
> > > > No one has complained about this that I know of yet, but it could have |
53 |
> > > > led to problems if you used anything that looked for |
54 |
> > > > /usr/lib/perl5/perlversion/[perlarch], which is where the CORE |
55 |
> > > > (emphasis not mine, that's how it is created) directory exists. |
56 |
> > > > If I don't hear anything by week's end, I'll unmask for good. |
57 |
> > > > |
58 |
> > > > Mike |
59 |
> > > > _______________________________________________ |
60 |
> > > > gentoo-dev mailing list |
61 |
> > > > gentoo-dev@g.o |
62 |
> > > > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
63 |
> |
64 |
> -- |
65 |
> Pieter Van den Abeele |
66 |
> pvdabeel@××××××.be - pvdabeel@g.o |
67 |
> |
68 |
> |
69 |
> |
70 |
> _______________________________________________ |
71 |
> gentoo-core mailing list |
72 |
> gentoo-core@g.o |
73 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-core |