Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-core@g.o, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] perl-5.6.1-r6 masked, needs testing on non i686's
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 06:35:45
Message-Id: 20020805113540.GA24983@datanode.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl-5.6.1-r6 masked, needs testing on non i686's by Pieter Van den Abeele
1 Pieter,
2
3 Thanks!!! The -r6 is the only one that matters right now. While
4 doing the initial test emerge of r6 yesterday, I saw the same problems I
5 am having with the ebuild of 8 that I'm working on. I think 8 is going
6 to need a rewrite from scratch instead of just an adaption of the
7 pervios perl install. And thanks for catching my foobar with the -r in
8 the header :)
9
10 Mike
11
12 On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 06:25:30AM -0500, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote:
13 >
14 > > perl-5.6.1-r6:
15 >
16 > emerge was successfull on ppc
17 > added ppc keyword
18 > did not unmask it, but added a small comment to packages.mask
19 >
20 > > perl-5.8.0:
21 >
22 > emerge failed on ppc, compilation succeeded but make test failed: This
23 > problem seems to be similar to the ghostscript problem I had earlier. One
24 > of the perl tests tries to perform some tests on the cache, and my machine
25 > seems to loop forever performing this test. (Could this be kernel related?
26 > can anyone with a Titanium 2 machine (550) test this?)
27 >
28 > I also corrected the headers of some of the files (5.6.1-r6 had a 5.6.1-r3
29 > header... I noticed that lintool *.ebuild did not complain about this
30 > but lintool <individual ebuild> did.)
31 >
32 > Best regards,
33 >
34 > Pieter
35 >
36 > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Michael Cummings wrote:
37 > >
38 > > > > From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
39 > > > > Date: Mon Aug 05, 2002 03:59:31 Europe/Brussels
40 > > > > To: gentoo-dev@g.o
41 > > > > Cc: gentoo-core@g.o
42 > > > > Subject: [gentoo-dev] perl-5.6.1-r6 masked, needs testing on non i686's
43 > > > >
44 > > > > Hey all,
45 > > > >
46 > > > > While working on the ebuild for 5.8.0, I noticed a few hardcoded
47 > > > > references to the i686 architecture. Further looking found it in all of
48 > > > > the 5.6.1 releases as well. I have commited (MASKED) perl-5.6.1-r6 and
49 > > > > would appreciate anyone willing to test. I changed the lines that
50 > > > > referred specifically to the i686 dir structure to instead use the
51 > > > > variable $PARCH, which should contain your platform specific arch name.
52 > > > > No one has complained about this that I know of yet, but it could have
53 > > > > led to problems if you used anything that looked for
54 > > > > /usr/lib/perl5/perlversion/[perlarch], which is where the CORE
55 > > > > (emphasis not mine, that's how it is created) directory exists.
56 > > > > If I don't hear anything by week's end, I'll unmask for good.
57 > > > >
58 > > > > Mike
59 > > > > _______________________________________________
60 > > > > gentoo-dev mailing list
61 > > > > gentoo-dev@g.o
62 > > > > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
63 >
64 > --
65 > Pieter Van den Abeele
66 > pvdabeel@××××××.be - pvdabeel@g.o
67 >
68 >
69 >
70 > _______________________________________________
71 > gentoo-core mailing list
72 > gentoo-core@g.o
73 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-core