Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:52:32 +0000 (UTC)
Ryan Hill posted on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:48:23 -0600 as excerpted:

> Is there any interest in allowing certain packages to be stabilized by
> the maintainer without going through the arch teams?  I always feel
> guilty when i file stabilization bugs for app-doc pkgs.

Weren't there already arrangements for this in some cases?  I distinctly 
recall a thread on it some time ago, with the conclusion being that 
various maintainers can get permission from the arch teams to keyword 
their own packages.

Now that was in the /general/ context of having access to the arch either 
directly/personally or thru available testing resource machines, but (as 
klausman accounts for in his post) that really doesn't apply to (for 
example) docs packages that don't require fancy build-chains or (with 
some sanity margin) where the build chain dependencies have been long 
stable, so "required testing resources" are virtually zero.

Thus, I'd say it's probably an extension of the previous arrangement -- 
but of course that does still require an initial one-time permission 
grant per arch, either per-package, or depending on arch/pkg-maintainer 
trust level, possible per category or similar.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman



References:
[RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Markos Chandras
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ben de Groot
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Joseph Jezak
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ryan Hill
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Next by thread:
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Previous by date:
Re: a pragmatic approach to FEATURES [was FEATURES use or misuse?]
Next by date:
Re: Re: Lastrite (part 1): KDE3-only applications that won't build when KDE4 is installed


Updated Nov 21, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.