Gentoo Linux -- List Archive: gentoo-dev

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647

List Archive: gentoo-dev

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Headers:

To:	gentoo-dev@g.o
From:	"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
Subject:	Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2012 10:43:30 -0400

On 05/23/2012 10:39 AM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> +1 for killing cvs
>
>

Looks like the bloodbath begins.  I too am in favor of killing cvs.

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : blueness@g.o
GnuPG FP  : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88  33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID  : D0455535

Replies:

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman

References:

Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Johannes Huber

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Alexey Shvetsov

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Previous by thread:

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

Next by thread:

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

Previous by date:

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

Next by date:

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.