Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass | ||
| Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:28:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100416212806.7bc6b307@snowmobile | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass by James Cloos |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:23:48 -0400 |
| 2 | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > OK. Let me rephrase. Portage does not need to validate local |
| 4 | > changes. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Sure it does. If it doesn't, and your local changes affect metadata, |
| 7 | horrible things happen. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > If a user uses a local eclass to override one in portage or in some |
| 10 | > remote overlay s/he follows, it is his/er responsibility to update |
| 11 | > it when the original undergoes major renovation. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Users aren't responsible... |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass | Steev Klimaszewski <steev@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> |