Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 12:16:21 +0200
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@...> wrote:
> Of course, there's a much larger infra component to the git migration, so
> either having that someone being an infra person, or at least having
> someone from infra have the time and be willing to work closely with
> them, is going to be critical.  But again, given a council "*priority*,
> let's move on it!" decision, I'd at least /hope/ that's not a blocker.

Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test the
conversion; so far, I haven't had any replies, though.

Cheers,

Dirkjan


Replies:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Alexey Shvetsov
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.