Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@g.o>
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o>
Subject: Re: Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 19:02:33 +0200
2010-07-05 18:37:37 Ciaran McCreesh napisaƂ(a):
> You're cluttering up your eclass with pointless junk
> under the mistaken impression that more complicated eclasses are
> better.

These eclasses don't contain any unnecessary code (except deprecated functions/variables).

> Besides, if you're not communicating anything for users, why have it
> there?

The colored output is intended and useful for ebuild maintainers.

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
References:
Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Re: Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Re: Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass
Next by thread:
Re: Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass
Previous by date:
Re: Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass
Next by date:
Re: Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.