Archives
Archives
| From: | Patrick Kursawe <phosphan@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Cc: | Mikael Andersson <snikkt@×××××.com> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Community driven meta distribution or only distribution (was Re: Several portage trees) | ||
| Date: | Wed, 30 Apr 2003 06:11:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20030430061119.GB29420@zaphod.anachem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Community driven meta distribution or only distribution (was Re: Several portage trees) by "Robin H.Johnson" |
||
| 1 | On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 11:17:13AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 | > most importantly, |
| 3 | > - say required items SLOT/KEYWORDS/IUSE/HOMEPAGE |
| 4 | > - say that all documentation should be installed |
| 5 | > - recommend econf/emake/einstall instead of normal variants |
| 6 | > - patch+src_unpack is not efficent and maybe incorrect, use PATCHES="..." |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Perhaps this is the moment to mention that you are using base.eclass... |
| 9 | I see users setting PATCHES and wondering why nothing happens. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Just my 0.02 EUR, |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Patrick |