| 1 |
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:19:21 -0400 |
| 2 |
"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Is rlpkg going behind the PM's back when it does selinux labelings? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Yup. Also, note that PMS has wording for selinux. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> I know there are difference, but if there's a screwup in some policy, it |
| 8 |
> also leads to horribly screwed up system. Nonetheless, I'm not |
| 9 |
> insensitive to what you are saying, and I think the safer approach |
| 10 |
> would be to write a howto and show the user how to manually convert |
| 11 |
> some typical binaries. There are only a handful that would be |
| 12 |
> targeted. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Why are caps so important that we should be encouraging users to |
| 15 |
subvert things, yet at the same time not important enough that they |
| 16 |
should be handled properly? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives