Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev-announce@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please help us decide naming scheme for cmake use calls
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:30:03
Message-Id: AANLkTin8anSBzqY+-QEqdaip0W6WiVKoWMJgtCOw=QDt@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Please help us decide naming scheme for cmake use calls by "Tomáš Chvátal"
1 2010/8/23 Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o>:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > Hi,
6 > as we discussed on scons.eclass thread at -dev ml we should have some
7 > nice naming scheme for use_xxx calls with cmake and scons. And it should
8 > be done in same fashion. for both So please head up to the formus poll
9 > [1] and vote for your favorite.
10
11 just pick one. I'm sure Mike would be happy if you followed the
12 'standard' but I doubt he would be heartbroken if you went the other
13 way. I don't really see the point of voting on which color we should
14 paint the bikeshed[1].
15
16 (for those who live under a rock and have never built a bikeshed)
17 [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson's_Law_of_Triviality
18
19 >
20 > The vote is open for 30 days starting 23. 8. 2010.
21 >
22 > This call is for developers/ht/at only. Users can't vote on this one.
23 >
24 > Cheers
25 >
26 > [1] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-841360.html
27 >
28 > - --------
29 > Tomáš Chvátal
30 > Gentoo Linux Developer [Cluster/Council/KDE/QA/Sci/X11]
31 > E-Mail          : scarabeus@g.o
32 > GnuPG FP        : 94A4 5CCD 85D3 DE24 FE99 F924 1C1E 9CDE 0341 4587
33 > GnuPG ID        : 03414587
34 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 > Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
36 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
37 >
38 > iEYEARECAAYFAkxyKo8ACgkQHB6c3gNBRYcxwwCeLafmCrz+ZfxkfRcGJX0Fb41v
39 > FsoAn2jdpxjRpOv5QwlqNrFBz4u8HqKj
40 > =q0uR
41 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
42 >
43 >