1 |
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:50:25PM -0500, Olivier CrĂȘte wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 10:41 +0200, Eray Aslan wrote: |
3 |
> > RedHat made some bad design decisions on RPM (.rpmnew files anyone?) and |
4 |
> > udev. Udev was probably salvagable before systemd but noone has the |
5 |
> > motivation or the man-power to manage the huge delta that would result |
6 |
> > now. It would probably amount to forking udev. So people are following |
7 |
> > along even if they are unhappy. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> This is completely unrelated to RPMs. |
10 |
|
11 |
The same packages are moving towards a system where config files reside |
12 |
under /usr/lib with users overriding the defaults in /etc |
13 |
(/usr/lib/udev/rules.d/ and /etc/udev/rules.d). I doubt this would have |
14 |
come about if RPM had a sensible way of dealing with config files -if |
15 |
they had etc-update/dispatch-conf for example. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Eray Aslan <eras@g.o> |