List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:36:32 -0500
Donnie Berkholz <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 15:34 Thu 15 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > ive converted my system over to x86/amd64/x32 multilib for funs.
> > but i can see how some people wont want all three all the time. so
> > the question is how we want to make this available to users at the
> > release/profile level.
> > background: x32 is a new ABI that runs on 64bit x86_64 processors.
> > see . you'll need gcc-4.7+, binutils-2.21.50+, glibc-2.15+, and
> > linux-3.2+.
> For anyone interested how the performance compares to amd64 in more
> comprehensive tests, check out the slides from the Linux Plumbers
> Conference (particularly 14-21):
> In summary, on those benchmarks it looks like a small global win
> (maybe 5%) on integer calculations with a few huge wins of ≥25%, but
> a net loss around 5% pretty much globally for floating-point
> Most people probably do a lot more integer calculations unless
> they're science geeks like me, plus it should have lower memory use,
> so my understanding is that it probably makes sense to switch to x32
> no matter what you're using now (x86 or amd64).
> Mike, would you agree?
But doesn't switching mean we're going to hit LFS PITA once again?