Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/modutils and module-init-tools
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 07:22:24
Message-Id: robbat2-20120225T071918-542327027Z@orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/modutils and module-init-tools by William Hubbs
1 On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:01:07AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
2 > The dependencies on module-init-tools in the tree should be changed to
3 > virtual/modutils. I am willing to do this myself if no one objects. If I
4 > do, should I open individual bugs for the packages?
5 As kernel-misc, I've fixed them all up.
6
7 > Also, this brings up another question. I replaced module-init-tools in
8 > the system set with virtual/modutils. But, since it is possible to have
9 > a linux system with a monolithic kernel, should this even be in the
10 > system set? If not, once the dependencies are correct, I propose
11 > dropping virtual/modutils from the system set.
12 I think we should examine dropping virtual/modutils from system.
13 It'll be on most systems anyway however. It's needed to build any
14 kernel, so the only place where it won't be would be a system with a
15 monolithic kernel that was built on a different host and copied over or
16 used for booting without being on the filesystem (common in VMs).
17
18 --
19 Robin Hugh Johnson
20 Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
21 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
22 GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: virtual/modutils and module-init-tools Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>