1 |
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:01:07AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> The dependencies on module-init-tools in the tree should be changed to |
3 |
> virtual/modutils. I am willing to do this myself if no one objects. If I |
4 |
> do, should I open individual bugs for the packages? |
5 |
As kernel-misc, I've fixed them all up. |
6 |
|
7 |
> Also, this brings up another question. I replaced module-init-tools in |
8 |
> the system set with virtual/modutils. But, since it is possible to have |
9 |
> a linux system with a monolithic kernel, should this even be in the |
10 |
> system set? If not, once the dependencies are correct, I propose |
11 |
> dropping virtual/modutils from the system set. |
12 |
I think we should examine dropping virtual/modutils from system. |
13 |
It'll be on most systems anyway however. It's needed to build any |
14 |
kernel, so the only place where it won't be would be a system with a |
15 |
monolithic kernel that was built on a different host and copied over or |
16 |
used for booting without being on the filesystem (common in VMs). |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
20 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
21 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
22 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |