Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:16:17
Message-Id: 4EC0174C.1010900@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default by Markos Chandras
1 On 11/13/2011 11:08 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
2 > On 11/13/2011 04:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 >> On Sunday 13 November 2011 05:48:40 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
4 >>> On 11/12/11 11:24 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
5 >>>> Most devs will be unhappy as it makes it harder to view the log
6 >>>> while building.
7 >>>
8 >>> We can have a different default in the developer profile.
9 >
10 >> the original reason for not doing this via profiles in the first
11 >> place was old versions of portage would barf. i think that still
12 >> applies to the developer profile :(. the first version of portage
13 >> to support this option was released in like ~Mar 2011. -mike
14 > Yeah but can't we just assume devs have recent versions of portage? I
15 > can't imagine a dev using a 6-month old portage :-/
16
17 Another problem is that the user may have another EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS
18 setting which overrides EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS from the profile, unless
19 they use something like EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--foo
20 ${EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS}" in order to explicitly inherit options from the
21 profile. And no, I don't think we should make EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS into
22 an "incremental" variable. I think the current behavior is just fine.
23 --
24 Thanks,
25 Zac