| 1 |
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 03:05:34 -0700 |
| 2 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > GLEP 55 *was* put up for a vote, along with GLEP 54, on 20090514. |
| 4 |
> > GLEP 54 was accepted subject to GLEP 55 being approved. The vote on |
| 5 |
> > GLEP 55 was a tie. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> A tie, with a decision to revisit next meeting- the next meeting it |
| 8 |
> was decided that yes, g55 is addressing what can be considered a real |
| 9 |
> issue. And in the 14 months since then, no one has requested it be |
| 10 |
> voted on, or revisited. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Uh, it *was* requested for a vote, and the Council decided instead to |
| 13 |
vote on something else and not upon what was asked. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If you want to try to get the Council to commit to something, feel |
| 16 |
free. But asking the Council to vote on it hasn't worked so far, and |
| 17 |
there comes a point where asking the same thing over and over again |
| 18 |
becomes rude and counterproductive. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It's extremely misleading of you to claim that it's the responsibility |
| 21 |
of the GLEP 55 authors to push it to the Council at this point. That |
| 22 |
was already tried several times, and got nowhere. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives