Archives
Archives
| From: | Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting) | ||
| Date: | Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:54:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1296302021.2670.1@NeddySeagoon | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Glep 48 update (as nominated for next meeting) by Jeroen Roovers |
||
| 1 | On 2011.01.29 05:20, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 2 | [snip] ... |
| 3 | > and that whoever feels to be in place to |
| 4 | > deal out QA (and I think this has gone wrong a few times recently) is |
| 5 | > required to: |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > 1) state and/or explain policy specifically where it is being not |
| 8 | > adhered to; |
| 9 | > 2) offer alternatives where policy is not adhered to. |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | [snip] |
| 12 | > jer |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Which is another way to say that QA is everyones job. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | Regards, |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Roy Bamford |
| 21 | (Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 22 | gentoo-ops |
| 23 | forum-mods |
| 24 | trustees |