On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:27:22 +0200
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote:
> Many of them applies as well to the alternative proposal, I wonder
> how you could say we, council, had to vote the other proposal given
> such (and other) issues were open.

No they don't. The alternative proposal is deliberately simple enough
to avoid those issues, whilst leaving the possibility of a larger
solution that does have scm revision awareness open for the future.

Does this mean you don't have answers then?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh